erudity.net prattlings on via nattering nabobs

25Apr/100

Double Down

While on duty last week I had multiple people come into the office and make a remark about the Double Down; clearly, it's arrived in the public consciousness.  Since I forgot to grab my lunch on the way into work, I was pretty hungry by the time I was relieved and was thinking about it on the way home, so I dropped by KFC to see what the hullabaloo was about.

"Sandwich" is a misnomer - it's just two chicken breasts with some cheese and bacon.  Most people would consider that an entree or two were it on a plate, but KFC calls it a "sandwich" and suddenly people are ecstatic or apoplectic.  I digress...

First, it's hefty.  You'd expect that from two chicken breasts with cheese and bacon, but really - this is 4 servings of chicken, 2 servings of bacon, 2 servings of cheese, plus whatever sauce they throw in there.  By my count, that's 930 calories and a whopping 3240 mg of sodium, while the RDA for calories and sodium is 2000 and 2400mg, respectively.  (The four servings of chicken come from the USDA definition of half a chicken breast as a serving.)  The sodium really comes through - I was having a bit of difficulty finishing the beast until I downed half my drink - and I didn't even touch the home fries that KFC gives you as part of the Double Down Meal.

The taste itself wasn't terrible, although the chicken was a bit overcooked.  You can't really taste the cheese or the bacon, but they do come through as texture when you bite into the "sandwich."  Mostly what you taste is salt, either in the breading or the sodium solution that they seemingly soak the chicken breasts in.  It definitely cured me of hunger but made me more thirsty than I can recall in recent memory - so going to the upsize or mega size or whatever it takes to get a large drink will definitely help you out if you'd like to try one yourself.

In the end, I don't think I'll get this ever again - it's just too damn salty.  KFC, for the love of god, try and bring the sodium down.  Use MSG if you have to.

Tagged as: No Comments
12Apr/100

Old, old things

This is my good friend Adam and I back in 1999.  He's on guitar, I'm on drums.

Machinehead

Too Much Noise

As It Were (with Jensen on bass)

Yeahhhhh....

Tagged as: , No Comments
24Mar/100

Ringing the bell

I instruct in the TH-57 - very similar to the "news helicopters" of the 80s and 90s.  Carries 5 people, two blades, skids to land on.  We use it because it's cheap, reliable, easy to fix, has readily available parts, etc. etc.  Considering all we put the birds through, it's a beast.  For example, on any given day a bird may have its engine cut to idle in flight, float to the ground, and then run the engine back up to full speed, for anywhere between five to ten or more times.  Point being, we run the birds into the ground, but they're designed for it, so they perform admirably.

Overtorques are a very notable exception.  You see, we have a very capable engine that gives us about 420 shaft horsepower, but a transmission that is only rated to 317 shaft horsepower.

TH-57

What a TH-57 may look like.

We also have a "droop compensation system" that responds at a rate commensurate with the rate at which you move the collective.  (The collective controls the pitch on the blades - more pitch = more thrust = needs more engine power.)  All of these things along with student jitters combine to create the overtorque.  We're normally allowed to go to 100% torque, with a 10-second allowance up to 110%.  Above that, you have to land the aircraft to get trucked back due to the fact that you may have damaged the drive train - and the aircraft doesn't fly for very long when disconnected from the engine.

Overtorques happen for many reasons - an improper pedal turn, bringing the engine online from idle while still applying pitch to the rotors, or, in my case the other day, a very quick increase in collective.  Instructors are given guidance to defensively posture themselves to avoid overtorques, to include advising you to place your hand over the collective to limit its travel when you think the student is about to increase it for whatever reason.  In my case, my student looked to end an approach early due to being in a bad place to make a safe landing.   He began to increase collective quickly and I wasn't in a good position to stop its travel and DING!  We hit 118%.  My first overtorque.

(for those wondering what "ringing the bell" is, it refers to the quickness with which the torquemeter's needle moves - and when it gets to 110% or more, the digital display flashes at you.  DING DING DING DING DING)

17Mar/100

Today’s flight

Weather was skosh while driving in, but we briefed anyway in anticipation of the clouds lifting later in the afternoon.  After briefing I saw a lot of red CNX WX up on the ops board and my studs were giving me a bit of pressure to cancel.  I had a feeling that we just needed to give the weather a bit more time, so I said we'd sit for a while and see how the cloud decks turned out.  Sure enough, in an hour and a half we had enough sky to go flying for a couple of BI flights.

I was a bit nervous, as this was my first flight with students and I was the first guy from my squadron to launch and go fly BIs, which have a different set of weather requirements than all our other flights.  After going through checklists that seemed to take twice as long as usual we got out to the working area - weather was juuuuust good enough to complete all our maneuvers.  Not bad for a first flight. To top it off, the lineman gave us a ride back to the hangar!

16Mar/100

Renovations

Carrington Blog crapped out on me while upgrading, so here's this shiny new theme.

Tagged as: No Comments