Onomatology
Or the study of proper names - and while my collection of names isn't universally proper, it is rather expanisve, ranging from nicknames garnered in 8th grade soccer to online handles to what my bosses call me. But let's start from the beginning.
Herbert Victor Allen IV. Very traditional, as belied by the "IV" appendage, and with that tradition comes some confusion - what do you call people when there are three (or more) HVAs in the room? My grandfather went by Herb, my dad by Vic and I go by Victor, but it depends. If I met you before graduating from college, you probably call me Victor. Since the Navy is all about brevity, Victor got shortened to Vic almost instantly, so most of my Navy friends and coworkers call me Vic. My bosses tend to call me Herbie because... well, I actually don't know. My first commanding officer started using it and the tradition (that word again) continues to this day - almost three years later. Today when I introduce myself it's a toss-up as to whether I'll use Vic or Victor and usually depends on the crowd that I'm hanging out with and which one they use. With so many different names it's not uncommon for people to mangle them a bit, with Vic commonly becoming "Vince" or "Vincent," Herbert becoming "Hurbert," "Hubert," "Hebert," or Allen becoming "Allan."
"Herbie" is something of a nickname and I have no shortage of those, either. My first real nickname was coined by a member of my 8th grade soccer team: "Habib," pronounced ha-beeb. I supposed I look a little Indian or something, but who knows. It only sticks with me today because my sister will still occasionally use it when she's annoyed with me. Of course being a pilot in the Navy we are assigned callsigns, except that in the helicopter community we refer to them as mess names. They usually stem from a humorous and embarrassing story that you're a central part of and while mine is no exception, I'll spare you the exposition and just let you know that I'm known in certain parts as "Ike."
My experiences using networked computers stretch back to 1989 and Prodigy, although we didn't really have screen names. The first online handle I remember was my old MSN handle of "Matrix_Man." Why that? Suffice to say that it was prior to the movie and had to do with mathematical matrices. Yeah, I'm a nerd. Around 1997 or so I was searching for a new handle to use on AOL Instant Messenger, which had just been released. I wen through several variations of "scorch," as it was a scorchingly hot day (booooo) before settling on "squorch." That's been my handle ever since.
Progressive Dinner
I'm hosting a progressive dinner for 6 on Saturday - don't ask how this came about. Any ideas for some main dishes? The theme is Mardi Gras/New Orleans. Yes, I know Fat Tuesday is already past us - it's just one more thing that's incredibly weird about this event.
Civilian Control
Some years ago I read Making The Corps, a book by Tom Ricks that's ostensibly about a platoon of Marine recruits as they make their way through boot camp at Parris Island, SC but shifts gears about halfway through, moving on to a history and examination of the current state of civilian control of the military along with the implications that the politicization of the military has on it. It's a great book and a good introduction to the issues surrounding both of those topics, of which I have a close-up of everyday. There's a gamut of opinion on the subject ranging from "active-duty military members shouldn't vote" to "military members should be active stakeholders in policies that affect them." I trend toward the latter, as I've seen the corrosive influence that vocal expressions of political opinion have on diversity of thought and their increasing effects on groupthink, which extends even to subjects that should be explicitly non-political.
So I was intrigued to read about the results of a MilitaryTimes poll about Obama, the writeup of which was full of choice quotations such as this:
“Being that the Marine Corps can be sent anywhere in the world with the snap of his fingers, nobody has confidence in this guy as commander in chief,” said one lance corporal who asked not to be identified.
There is a caveat to the poll results that's buried rather far down:
The responses are not representative of the opinions of the military as a whole. The survey group overall under-represents minorities, women and junior enlisted service members, and over-represents soldiers.
What's left unsaid is that what you're left with are the heart of the professional corps of servicemembers that make our modern military. As such, these results are somewhat disturbing - is there a point where military members will publicly and vocally disagree with their chain of command as with the Revolt of the Admirals? What about DADT? (My fears about DADT are actually a bit overstated - I believe that as older members retire, resign or simply leave the service you'll see a shift in attitudes rather quickly.) My biggest fear is that the military will reach a critical mass of politicization and will then be forever lost to a whole other segment of the population - one that isn't conservative and Republican - with dire implications for the right (or wrong) leader who happens to either cross that ultra-politicized military or charm them into doing his/her bidding.



